NE Wire Service

Judiciary Committee

March 13, 2025

Committee Chair: Sen. Senator Carolyn Bosn | Bills Heard: 5 | Full Transcript (PDF)


LB584: Moderate criminal penalties for children charged as adults

Introduced by: Sen. Senator Ashlei Spivey | Testimony: 6 proponents, 1 opponents, 0 neutral | Read bill text (PDF)

Senator Spivey advances bill to cap sentences for children tried as adults. LB584 would moderate criminal penalties for juveniles charged in adult court, ensuring children under 18 cannot receive life sentences without parole for serious felonies. The bill adjusts sentencing ranges for Class IA through IIA felonies while maintaining substantial penalties.

Why it matters: Nebraska currently allows children to face the same sentences as adults, creating de facto life sentences through consecutive terms. The bill aligns Nebraska with 28 states that have already restricted juvenile life sentences, reflecting scientific consensus that children's developing brains make them less culpable and more amenable to rehabilitation.

What they're saying: Proponents cited data showing former juvenile lifers released after similar reforms show only 1.14% recidivism and become productive citizens. "Children are constitutionally different from adults, and their sentences should reflect that," testified Jennifer Houlden of the Public Defender's Office. County attorneys opposed the bill, arguing current law already allows judges to consider age and that outlier cases justify existing ranges.

By the numbers: 59 Nebraskans currently serve juvenile life or virtual life sentences. Voices for Children estimated productive adults contribute over $1 million to society versus $2.5 million cost of lifetime incarceration per child.

What's next: No vote was taken. The bill received 24 proponent written comments, 5 opponent comments, and no neutral comments.

Committee sentiment:   Supportive: Sen. DeBoer, Sen. Holdcroft   Unclear: Sen. Storm

Sentiment estimated from questions and comments — not stated positions.


LB407: Establish juvenile court jurisdiction with transfer provisions for serious felonies

Introduced by: Sen. Senator John Cavanaugh | Testimony: 0 proponents, 7 opponents, 1 neutral | Read bill text (PDF)

Senator Cavanaugh proposes juvenile court as starting point for all children, with adult prosecution only after rehabilitation fails. LB407 would give juvenile court original jurisdiction over children ages 13-16 charged with serious felonies, allowing transfer to adult court only upon finding the child is not amenable to rehabilitation. The bill represents a middle ground between those advocating for exclusive juvenile court jurisdiction and those seeking to lower the age for adult prosecution.

Why it matters: The bill addresses concerns that some children charged with serious crimes may need adult court consequences while preserving the rehabilitative focus of juvenile justice. It reflects research showing juvenile courts have successfully rehabilitated youth and that early intervention works.

What they're saying: Opponents raised significant procedural concerns, particularly about post-dispositional transfers creating double jeopardy issues and confusion about which court should make transfer decisions. "The juvenile court is the best positioned to decide what it can or cannot handle," testified Chelsie Krell of the Public Defender's Office. Voices for Children testified neutrally, noting the bill's core concept has merit but procedural issues need resolution.

By the numbers: Data shows juvenile arrests, detention admissions, and felony charging have declined since 2013 reforms, with no evidence of a crisis requiring expanded adult prosecution.

What's next: No vote was taken. The bill received 5 proponent written comments, 4 opponent comments, and no neutral comments. Senator Cavanaugh indicated willingness to work on procedural refinements.

Committee sentiment:   Supportive: Sen. DeBoer   Skeptical: Sen. McKinney   Unclear: Sen. Holdcroft

Sentiment estimated from questions and comments — not stated positions.


LB556: Lower age for juvenile detention and charging juveniles as adults

Introduced by: Sen. Senator Merv Riepe | Testimony: 8 proponents, 30 opponents, 2 neutral | Read bill text (PDF)

Senator Riepe's priority bill would lower age for juvenile detention and adult prosecution, sparking hours of testimony on youth justice. LB556 would allow 11-year-olds to be detained and 12-year-olds to be charged as adults for serious felonies, shifting detention decisions from probation officers to judges. The bill generated the longest hearing of the day, with over 40 testifiers presenting sharply conflicting views on juvenile justice.

Why it matters: The bill reflects a fundamental disagreement about how Nebraska should respond to serious juvenile crime. Proponents cite specific cases of young children committing murders and argue detention is necessary intervention. Opponents argue juvenile crime is declining and that detention causes trauma, particularly for youth of color already overrepresented in the system.

What they're saying: Victim family members testified emotionally about children killed by juveniles and the inadequacy of current consequences. "Our system is not working," said Tammy Parker, whose nephew was killed by a 14-year-old who was caught with a gun again months later. Opponents countered with data: Omaha is experiencing a 34-year low in homicides and 40-year low in non-fatal shootings. "Locking up children makes them more likely to re-offend, not less," testified Fran Kaye, citing research on detention's traumatic effects.

By the numbers: Douglas County filed 412 juvenile felony cases in 2024; juveniles with five or more felonies peaked at 36 in 2023 but declined to 28 in 2024. Research shows 48 hours is the threshold after which detention causes unique trauma. Omaha 360 violence prevention initiative has achieved historic lows in gun violence.

What's next: No vote was taken. The bill received 3 proponent written comments, 113 opponent comments, and 1 ADA testimony in opposition.

Committee sentiment:   Supportive: Sen. Storer, Sen. Hallstrom   Skeptical: Sen. DeBoer   Opposed: Sen. McKinney   Unclear: Sen. Rountree

Sentiment estimated from questions and comments — not stated positions.


LB694: Prohibit discrimination based on military or veteran status

Introduced by: Sen. Senator Dunixi Guereca | Testimony: 5 proponents, 0 opponents, 0 neutral | Read bill text (PDF)

Senator Guereca advances military anti-discrimination bill with no opposition. LB694 would prohibit discrimination based on military or veteran status in employment, housing, education, and public accommodations. The bill received five proponent written comments and no opposition or neutral testimony.

Why it matters: While Nebraska is known as a veteran-friendly state, it currently lacks explicit state-level anti-discrimination protections for service members and their families. Federal protections under the Uniformed Services Employment and Redeployment Act (USERRA) are limited. This bill fills that gap.

What they're saying: Senator Guereca noted that service members and families make substantial sacrifices in time, physical safety, and geographic stability. The bill reflects the Department of Defense's commitment to ensure service members and families are protected from bias and discrimination.

By the numbers: Five organizations submitted proponent comments supporting the bill.

What's next: No vote was taken. Senator Guereca waived closing. The bill had no fiscal note.


LB470: Allow attorneys to offer evidence to court without notarization

Introduced by: Sen. Senator Carolyn Bosn | Testimony: 1 proponents, 0 opponents, 1 neutral | Read bill text (PDF)

Senator Bosn's bill would allow attorneys to file court documents without notarization. LB470 would permit attorneys to offer evidence or documents to the court without notarization when signing in their professional capacity representing a party. The bill is narrowly tailored and reflects existing federal court procedures and ethical rules.

Why it matters: The bill reduces unnecessary procedural burdens on attorneys while maintaining safeguards through the penalty of perjury provision and existing ethical rules requiring attorney candor to the tribunal. Attorneys face license suspension or disbarment for lying to courts.

What they're saying: The Nebraska State Bar Association supported the bill, noting it mirrors federal procedures and reflects existing ethical obligations. Tim Hruza provided examples including appointed counsel submitting billable hour affidavits and discovery matters where lawyers certify actions taken in cases.

By the numbers: Five proponent written comments were submitted; two opponent comments were submitted; zero neutral comments.

What's next: No vote was taken. Senator Bosn waived closing.

Committee sentiment:   Unclear: Sen. Rountree, Sen. Hallstrom

Sentiment estimated from questions and comments — not stated positions.


Session Notes

The Judiciary Committee held hearings on five bills on March 13, 2025. The hearing on LB556 was particularly lengthy, with over 40 testifiers presenting testimony on juvenile justice issues. Committee Chair Bosn noted at the beginning of the hearing that there would be two additional hearings after LB556. The committee received written position comments on all bills, with LB556 receiving the most opposition (113 opponent comments). No votes were taken on any of the bills during this hearing.


Generated by NE Wire Service | Source: Nebraska Legislature Transcribers Office This is an AI-generated summary. Verify all claims against the official transcript.